No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches

Shahid, Muhammad; Rossholm, Andreas; Lövström, Benny; Zepernick, Hans-Jürgen

doi:10.1186/1687-5281-2014-40

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 1 Characteristic summary of single-artifact-based metrics

From: No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches

Method	Reference	Processing	Resolution	Test data^a	Performance^b
Blurring	Narvekar et al.[21]	JPEG2000	768 × 512	LIVE image, TID2008,	(LIVE) PC = 0.88, SC = 0.88
		Gaussian blur	768 × 512	IVC, Toyoma	(LIVE) PC = 0.91, SC = 0.94
	Ciancio et al.[22]	Multiple	Multiple	6,000 test images	Multiple
	Hassen et al.[28]	Multiple	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.92, SC = 0.93
	Ferzli et al.[29]	JPEG2000	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.88, SC = 0.87
		Gaussian blur	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.93, SC = 0.94
	Varadarajan et al.[34]	Gaussian blur	-	24 test images	PC = 0.75
	Debing et al.[35]	H.264/AVC	HD	1,176 test images	PC = 0.85
	Maaloof et al.[37]	Multiple	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.96, SC = 0.95
	Chen et al.[41]	Gaussian blur	768 × 512	LIVE image	SC = 0.61
	Chetouani et al.[43]	Gaussian blur	Multiple	LIVE image, IVC	PC = 0.86 (LIVE), 0.94 (IVC)
	Hua et al.[44]	Gaussian blur	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.96, SC = 0.95
	Oprea et al.[45]	JPEG2000	768 × 512	29 test images	PC = 0.85
Blocking	Chen et al.[46]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.96, SC = 0.94
		MPEG-2	768 × 512	LIVE video	PC = 0.95, SC = 0.85
	Liu et al.[47]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.73, SC = 0.91
	Liu et al.[48]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.79, SC = 0.91
	Zhai et al.[49]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.96, SC = 0.91
	Babu et al.[50]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	R-square = 0.95
	Zhang et al.[52]	H.264/AVC	CIF	50 test videos	-
	Hua et al.[53]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.92, SC = 0.83
	Suthahran et al.[55]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.94
Ringing	Liu et al.[56]	JPEG	768 × 512	16 test images	-
	Liu et al.[57]	JPEG	768 × 512	55 test images	PC = 0.80, SC = 0.73
	Zuo et al.[59]	-	171 × 256	LIVE image	PC = 0.94
Temporal impairments	Borer[71]	H.264/AVC	CIF, HD	-	-
	Huynh-Thu et al.[72]	-	QCIF	-	PC = 0.95
	Wolf[75]	H.264/AVC	SD	VQEG phase 1	-
	Yang et al.[78]	-	QCIF	6 SRCs	PC = 0.94

^aThe used test database; ^bperformance denotes the correlation with subjective assessment, unless stated otherwise; SRC, source sequence; PC, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; SC, Spearman’s rank order correlation coefficient.

Back to article page